Theatre of Dreams83
Member
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2017
- Messages
- 26,136
- Reaction score
- 2,231
- Points
- 113
Most clubs don’t want neutral venues so can’t see that getting voted on. And the TV still want most of there money refunded also. Gonna be tough to sort out for sureUsing neutral venues seems like sensible compromise that should minimize the risks. Fans wouldn't show up so no violation of social distancing, and clubs will collect TV money at least.
It's a tricky situation for sure. Either some form of restart, with restritions of course, or clubs will start running into financial trouble. Players will land of their feet of course, but the staff will suffer. And good luck finding another job the way things are going, stable employment is gonna be worth gold.
Using neutral venues seems like sensible compromise that should minimize the risks. Fans wouldn't show up so no violation of social distancing, and clubs will collect TV money at least.
It's a tricky situation for sure. Either some form of restart, with restritions of course, or clubs will start running into financial trouble. Players will land of their feet of course, but the staff will suffer. And good luck finding another job the way things are going, stable employment is gonna be worth gold.
just read that. Prefer that to this neutral grounds nonsense if they can make it safeIts pretty simple to me.
If it's deemed not 100% safe to host games in front of fans at your own stadium at this stage, then it's not safe to host games at a neutral venue either. All it does is reduces the risk. And 'less risky' shouldn't justify this ridiculous need to get things started again. The argument on fans turning up at one ground doesn't wash as they could just as easily turn up at a neutral one.
As it happens, it all looks moot as Police forces have had an about change today and now appear sound with games at the original venues providing safety criteria is met.
Wtf is this no look tackling there talking about ????
What would your solution be as Scouse?