Transfer Rumour Thread 2011/2012

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted member 79730
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 8K
  • Views Views 617K
Status
Not open for further replies.
Oh dear. It's clear to see that the Sheikhs take-over of Manchester City has had a bigger impact on football than we thought - it's brought a new breed of fan - the moronic, delusional "look at us, we're rich we can do what we want" naive type.
 
StuW said:
Nasri and Clichy to Citeh...another two Arsenal players who the Gunners are prepared to sell, and no-one else can/will meet their demands, so they go to City.

All in all, it is win win for Arsenal. Two out, a healthy sum coming in, more than enough to replace them with, say with Coentrao and Menez.....
Click to expand...

But there is no guarentees Arsene will spend is there. He will have to but whether he will or not is different all together
 
*Jones* said:
Oh dear. It's clear to see that the Sheikhs take-over of Manchester City has had a bigger impact on football than we thought - it's brought a new breed of fan - the moronic, delusional "look at us, we're rich we can do what we want" naive type.
Click to expand...

The Sheikhs are the ones that are inflating the transfer market as well. Five years ago, 20m would buy you more or less any player on the planet bar a handful

---------- Post added at 08:46 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:46 PM ----------
CJACKO11 said:
But there is no guarentees Arsene will spend is there. He will have to but whether he will or not is different all together
Click to expand...

True. He may decide to fast-track some kids that may be ready.
 
*Jones* said:
Oh dear. It's clear to see that the Sheikhs take-over of Manchester City has had a bigger impact on football than we thought - it's brought a new breed of fan - the moronic, delusional "look at us, we're rich we can do what we want" naive type.
Click to expand...

Now, I'm not one of those people, but it seems like it has also created another type of people. The "I wish we had so much money we could buy who we want, so lets talk **** about those who have" people.
 
Anyone else think with Fabregas, Clichy, Denilson, Eboue all leaving this summer, Wenger's young kids plan has officially failed?
 
Mads2506 said:
Now, I'm not one of those people, but it seems like it has also created another type of people. The "I wish we had so much money we could buy who we want, so lets talk **** about those who have" people.
Click to expand...

Yes, but some clubs have the cash, but don't see the need to splash 20m on someone because they can.
 
Wenger aint slow though, he's got something planned if he's letting them go. Nasri wasn't signing a contract and getting 20mil now seems like a great option. They will be looking for something similar for Clichy im sure.

Arsenal will replace them though, just like they replaced Henry, Ashley Cole, Pires and co. Gervinho seems the likely switch to replace Nasri but he's a similar type player to Eden Hazard and Juan Mata who would be good replacements. I can see them going for Baines as a Clichy replacement.
 
StuW said:
Yes, but some clubs have the cash, but don't see the need to splash 20m on someone because they can.
Click to expand...

Neither do I. I can see why someone would be bitter about Man City buying whoever they want for exaggerated fees though. I just think they should maybe look on the bright side of it at times. They are getting more cash for their players than they deserve, seems a good deal to me.

---------- Post added at 08:52 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:52 PM ----------
Ride The Walrus said:
Anyone else think with Fabregas, Clichy, Denilson, Eboue all leaving this summer, Wenger's young kids plan has officially failed?
Click to expand...

None have left yet.
 
Mads2506 said:
Neither do I. I can see why someone would be bitter about Man City buying whoever they want for exaggerated fees though. I just think they should maybe look on the bright side of it at times. They are getting more cash for their players than they deserve, seems a good deal to me.

---------- Post added at 08:52 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:52 PM ----------



Non have left yet.
Click to expand...

No it doesn't. They are very slowly destroying football.
 
Yeah, but the knock on effects of the inflated fees push up the prices of other players. Thats why we are seeing Wickham bought for 9-12m, Henderson for 18m, Carroll for 35m and so on.

---------- Post added at 08:55 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:54 PM ----------
Nil Satis Nisi Optimum said:
No it doesn't. They are very slowly destroying football.
Click to expand...

This
 
Mads2506 said:
Neither do I. I can see why someone would be bitter about Man City buying whoever they want for exaggerated fees though. I just think they should maybe look on the bright side of it at times. They are getting more cash for their players than they deserve, seems a good deal to me.

---------- Post added at 08:52 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:52 PM ----------



None have left yet.
Click to expand...

didn't say they had.
 
StuW said:
I would take him, would fit in at a mid-table club nicely. Although, he no doubt will price himself out of that option.
Click to expand...

Denilson is not a prem type player imo he better suited to spain or italy
 
Mads2506 said:
But it does seem a good deal to ME. It might not to you, but I didn't say anything about that.
Click to expand...

Thats fine, i was stating it doesn't sound good to me. Man City spending 100's of millions controlling the football world with money while teams like Arsenal are suffering because of the money demands. City can offer more always.

I cant wait for the day a player turns round and says "Hey, why would i join City, they've got no history"
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

FMBase

Beta

Resources

Back
Top