Kiddo, lol. I'm not trying to insult anyone. It's true, Arsenal can't sell player.
Where are you getting this?.
Arsene Wenger is the greatest when it comes to when to sell a player!
Kiddo, lol. I'm not trying to insult anyone. It's true, Arsenal can't sell player.
A title winning side...and im not cocky.
Where are you getting this?.
Arsene Wenger is the greatest when it comes to when to sell a player!
Really? Flamini springs to mind
Kiddo, lol. I'm not trying to insult anyone. It's true, Arsenal can't sell player. However, this isn't thread about it. If you want, I can continue to write on this topic ( Arsenal). But people call Bebe a flop, and they forgot that Obertan is just 21! And about Berbatov, he's great, I can't see why would someone called him a flop ( except being bitter). Torres, however, has premiership exp, but he wasn't on his level for 2, 2 and half years now. To buy him for 50m and he only scored once (1) in 15 games I think. That's definition of flop.
Not at all. Wenger has no intention of letting him leave. he actually said he'd rather lose him next year. "Big teams cannot be seen to be losing their players"
tbh that hasn't improved too much, IMO a worse left back, a right winger who isn't a great deal better than competition, although the strike force looks great, still hoping Dzeko can come good (technically he's not a flop if torres isn't (i don't think either are))
We can resume the Arsenal discussion via visitor walls, because I'm convinced you have no idea what you're talking about regarding Wenger's selling decisions.
Yes, Obertan is 21. So? Old enough to have developed into a fine player at Manchester United for 2 years, but he has failed.
So when Torres begins to perform he becomes a 'previous flop that isn't a flop anymore'?. Doesn't work like that, you either are or you aren't and it's too soon to put that label on Torres yet.
Anyway, we've exhausted the Aguero rumour, if you want to reply to my other points do it via visitor wall.
Yea..few weeks ago. He said he wants Clichy to stay before he went to City. Same happened with Thierry Henry i think. And others...
After all...i doubt the Arsenal board will reject 20m+ from City if Nasri doesn't sign a new contract. Nasri isn't worth the gamble either tbh.
---------- Post added at 09:45 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:38 PM ----------
What? Clichy is far worse than Kola. I mean..Kola is a decent left-back. A tall and big one. But he lacks pace. While Clichy has plenty of pace.
I have watched the 2 City friendlies this pre-season. City have conceeded 1 goal and it was because of Kolarov. He was comnig back from his run down the flank but the winger crossed to the striker to score because Kola didn't stop the winger because he lacks pace. Clichy would have gotten that one.
Both have played 45 mins each in both games. And Clichy has been very good. He was one of the best players on the pitch in the first one. I know it's just friendlies...but i think Clichy is seriously underrated.
Yea..few weeks ago. He said he wants Clichy to stay before he went to City. Same happened with Thierry Henry i think. And others...
After all...i doubt the Arsenal board will reject 20m+ from City if Nasri doesn't sign a new contract. Nasri isn't worth the gamble either tbh.
Well he couldn't really say we don't want him at Arsenal any more.. We offered a contract, accepted a bid, he accepted City's offer. Nothing more to it really - we tried to sell him last season. Completely different to Nasri.
Well we did keep Henry for another season after he said that so what's your point?
And you make it sound as if the Arsenal board will just by-pass Wenger and accept £20m (when our valuation is at least £25m) if a bid comes in from City. It won't happen like that... Every single decision re: transfers will go through Wenger (bar U16/18s who go through Brady)
Ohh well....City want him. Not just because he only has 1-year left of his contract. Well...if he had more City wouldn't get him im sure.
But im sure City will offer that 25m Arsenal want. Mancini wants him. Wenger would have a hard time explaining to his board that he wants to take a 25million gamble on Nasri. And have him for just 1 season!
I think Kroenke would tell him to stick that opinion up in his ****.
£25 mil for someone with one year left on his contract and who had half an excellent year last season is excellent business though.
Except they wont, and thats the key thing behind Wenger holding onto him. Its very unlikely that the board will overrule him
I'm so confident Nasri will resign that IF he signs for MCFC I will have a username change to 'Strawberry Sally'. .
I'm so confident Nasri will resign that IF he signs for MCFC I will have a username change to 'Strawberry Sally'. Not happening Mr Madridista, focus more on Marin/Diego/Montolivo/De Rossi as potential incomings.
Dont ruin it for me. I still believe he will become a City player soon.
Since when has Wenger wanted to hold onto players who dont want to be there and when you can get a good fee for him?! Everytime he would put Nasri on the teamsheet he knows this guy doesn't want to be here and will leave at the end of this season. Im sure he doesn't want that.
@Jamie...**** those lightweight Montolivos and Marins. I want Nasri! If we dont get him...which we will!!! We will get Lavezzi.
Except not De Rossi, right?
---------- Post added at 11:12 PM ---------- Previous post was at 11:12 PM ----------
You seriously want Nasri more than the people Jamie said?
I wont shagg my girlfriend in a year if Nasri doesn't join! He will hand in a transfer request just for me! <3
Im also willing to bet my left ******** he will join!
Mancini wants him and if he does...he will get him one way or another. Simples. And i also believe Wenger wouldn't like it...which is a bonus.
I'm so confident Nasri will resign that IF he signs for MCFC I will have a username change to 'Strawberry Sally'. Not happening Mr Madridista, focus more on Marin/Diego/Montolivo/De Rossi as potential incomings.