Have you ever thought baout maybe.. having 1 or 2 defending midfielders and then 1 or 2 central midfielders? that way keeping the 3 strikers but having a slightly more solid midfield? Just throwing things in the air
you boys no a bit better than me but just putting the BWM-S down to a DM-D position should make a bit more support for the 2 centre backs so you might not need 2 defensive mids.
Haha, yeah that was supposed to be symmetrical aswell Im currently testing with the run wide setting on both, but im not seeing much difference either way..Hi Volliz, on your 433 original v2 the mcl has run wide with ball but the mcr does not.
Is that correct or perhaps both should or should not have the instruction?
I notice most of you instructions appear to be symmetrical.
I know it makes little difference but was just wondering
Thankyou
Just managed to sign Icardi for Crystal Palace! Any suggestions on where to play him. Have Giroud as my main striker with Munir and James Wilson up beside him
Hard to tell, only difference is the defenders.. I believe the v2 should limit opposition chances slightly due to the defenders closing down more aggressively giving the opposition less time on the ball, but personally i think i prefer the original as i don't really care that much how many i concede as long as i score more..volliz in your opinion what tactic is better your 433 original or v2
8(Hey, wow absolutly amazing Tactik. But in my opinion to many goals by Corners... Actually 12 from 23
I demand a V0lliz 433, v3!
LOL.
And what do you expect from it? Fewer conceded or more goals or perhaps an away tactic?