But surely the criminals won't let their business die down, I mean that'd mean they'd have to work with like, society! I just can't imagine legalising weed being a solution to less crime, just a re-distribution of where the crime is. If they make less money from weed, they may well just choose to exploit other areas of crime i.e Loan sharks, prostitution etc. If you think of a regular business, say a dairy farmer, if they have less demand for milk, will they just stand to lose their profit or re-distribute their resource to cheese? I have no statistics to back myself up on this, just makes sense in my head.
I'm also not saying I'm necessarily against legalisation, since Chaz made some sound arguments against me in the other thread so now I'm not sure, but I don't use nor plan on using it, so it has little effect anyway.
Fair point you're making, but if that was the case there'd be no point trying to stop any single crime, because surely they'd just move on to another one? No point trying to stop rapists, they'll move on to money laundering! Whilst I'm exaggerating slightly, you can see my point: no two crimes are necessarily homogenous. Loan sharking is a completely different ball game to dealing in drugs. For starters, you need at least a rudimentary knowledge of your and everyone else's legal rights. Dealers would stay dealing because it's the only thing they know how to do: they're not well educated, they probably don't have a job (generalising slightly, yes, but mostly true too) and they'd find it a struggle to move onto another crime.
If I was being a ****, I could say the money being raised from the taxing of weed could be put into the police force to combat crime. I'm feeling like a **** today, so you could do just that.
Also, I give you the Dutch, ladies and gentlemen. They've managed to deal with it pretty **** well.