Rubbish. Completely possible to die from a weed overdose.
Also, your sig needs changing.
EDIT: Played Joel. I'll find some time to reply to that at some point.
Please go ahead and cite one instance when this ever happened in history.
Rubbish. Completely possible to die from a weed overdose.
Also, your sig needs changing.
EDIT: Played Joel. I'll find some time to reply to that at some point.
Obviously, but I'm curious as to why so many people on the thread are so passionately against it...if you don't like it, whatever, don't do it, but no reason to get mad at others for enjoying it. It would be like if I want on to the FM general discussion forum and made a bunch of posts saying how bad computer games are and how they waste your time and how they're addicting, etc.
Anyways, what I was more curious about was the number of negative responses as well as the passion...I have this perception that Europeans are really liberal with this kind of thing, but from what it looks like, Britain isn't. Even in the States most people have come around and don't really care too much whether it's legal or not (a recent Gallup poll showed that 80% of Americans thought it should be legal for medical purposes, and 48% thought it should be legal in general).
So I'm just curious as to what Britain's attitude is on the subject...but from what it sounds like, you guys are more conservative than Americans, which is a bit of a shock to me. Kind of a contradiction, Andy Gray makes a sexist remark off-air and should be crucified for it yet if I want to do something in the privacy of my own home the same people are up in arms about it. Not a criticism of the anti-weed people here, to each his own, I was just curious about what Britain's attitude is on it, and am surprised at what I'm seeing.
Please go ahead and cite one instance when this ever happened in history.
To be honest, when it comes to the legalising part, I'm in two minds. Obviously, what happened to my brother made firmly anti-drug, but at the same time I can see the benefits in medicinal uses. People can be against it for so many reasons, it would be impossible to list them all. But if it was to be legalised, it could potentially open a can of worms of major proportions.
Fair enough, I wasn't trying to argue with you, I was just curious as to what Britain's attitude as a whole is about weed. Judging from the thread it's quite frowned upon, at least compared to other western European nations (I think, well certainly compared to somewhere like Holland).
Why can't people be passionately against it. Why are others passionately for it? Everyone has an opinion, debates wouldn't happen if the person against something just rolled over. I personally couldn't really care either way.
I don't think a FM forum is the best place to gather the opinions of a country either. And 42% of statistics are made up!
Also, Andy Gray deserved to be sacked. a) He wasn't at home, he was at work. b) He's a representative of the sport, and supposed to be a professional.
---------- Post added at 12:27 AM ---------- Previous post was at 12:26 AM ----------
http://wiki.answers.com/Q/How_many_people_die_each_year_from_marijuana - Google, it's hard. It's an extremely rare thing to happen, doesn't mean it doesn't.
So wait we are ******* for not using something that can put is in prison and harm us.
Rule one, stay away from the brownAlthough cannabis may be used for medicine. It is different to 'weed' that is bought and sold on the street which quite frankly, full of ****.
I'd say its more likely that a cannabis smoker is more likely to know more about cannabis than most other topics tbh. People I know that smoke now and then, parties etc don't know the first thing about it scientifically or botanically, where-as the people I know that are heavy smokers know far more than you'd think had you known them personally (though it could be argued that's due to having to argue their case against anti-weed peeps). I dont know why but it creates a passion, hence the millions of people calling for legilisation, the many books/ films - the whole culture really, its something else.Since I'm sure a lot of users of weed don't understand the effects of weed, it's far worst for them to make uninformed decisions and get hooked on harder, more dangerous drugs.
Aw diddums, so naive. To quote a paraphernalia site - "everyone does it" (dot com for those interested)Also you're the massive ***, no, not everybody is doing weed at my age
It takes on average 21 grams of pure THC to cause an overdose (based on the LD50 of rats or somethin), and it would have to be smoked within a 15 minute timescale. I trust your IQ is high enough that you realise this is entirely not possible.Rubbish. Completely possible to die from a weed overdose
dont get me wrong, wasnt tryin to start arguement or anything lol. But, yeah, the weed (rightly or wrongly) is pretty much frowned upon. But for a whole variety of reasons. But it could be, that due to Liberalism becoming more prominent in the UK, that it's still being frowned upon, but more tolerated. If I worded that right lol
dont get me wrong, wasnt tryin to start arguement or anything lol. But, yeah, the weed (rightly or wrongly) is pretty much frowned upon. But for a whole variety of reasons. But it could be, that due to Liberalism becoming more prominent in the UK, that it's still being frowned upon, but more tolerated. If I worded that right lol
ok I'm late to this stupid party but some people need sorting. I'll stick to page 3 and 4 to facilitate my lateness. Also Blakefish80 had a long stupid post, that raised many points similiar to my own but since he posted them in a profoundly stupid way, and in fact hindered the pro-pot side of this thread, I decided to ignore him entirely.
Some ****:
I. In short, its common sense, but if someone doesn't want to smoke weed then that's fine - they're not *******. As soon as they start the whole 'being a **** about weed' thing however, you need a bitchslap. Anybody who actively acts negatively towards someone because they smoke weed is a ****, plain and simple - including everyone who has done that on this thread. Someone open-minded enough to not smoke but know facts and statistics would understand that there is no risk with cannabis worth actively discouraging it. If you spend 20 minutes googling and learning I'm sure by the end anybody not surrounded in stubbornness will realise that quite simply, 'whats the problem?'
II.
Ok, unless you're selling the stuff (and have been caught with scales, baggies and cash to prove it) or unless you're carrying at least 2 ounces (£300 +) - you're not going to jail unless you've been caught doing exactly the same TWICE before, less than 2 ounces can be claimed as personal use (though you might have to admit to dependence and attend rehab to avoid the slammer) Even then if you're not going to court with your burberry cap, chains and swearing then you're more likely to get a Drug Correctional course thing and some community service type **** (unless you were seeeriously packing)
III.
Rule one, stay away from the brown
IV.
I'd say its more likely that a cannabis smoker is more likely to know more about cannabis than most other topics tbh. People I know that smoke now and then, parties etc don't know the first thing about it scientifically or botanically, where-as the people I know that are heavy smokers know far more than you'd think had you known them personally (though it could be argued that's due to having to argue their case against anti-weed peeps). I dont know why but it creates a passion, hence the millions of people calling for legilisation, the many books/ films - the whole culture really, its something else.
V.
Aw diddums, so naive. To quote a paraphernalia site - "everyone does it" (dot com for those interested)
VI.
It takes on average 21 grams of pure THC to cause an overdose (based on the LD50 of rats or somethin), and it would have to be smoked within a 15 minute timescale. I trust your IQ is high enough that you realise this is entirely not possible.
You're confusing the terms highly rare and impossible. http://wiki.answers.com/Q/How_many_people_die_each_year_from_marijuana
Super Conclusion of Doom:
ok I'm late to this stupid party but some people need sorting. I'll stick to page 3 and 4 to facilitate my lateness. Also Blakefish80 had a long stupid post, that raised many points similiar to my own but since he posted them in a profoundly stupid way, and in fact hindered the pro-pot side of this thread, I decided to ignore him entirely.
Some ****:
I. In short, its common sense, but if someone doesn't want to smoke weed then that's fine - they're not *******. As soon as they start the whole 'being a **** about weed' thing however, you need a bitchslap. Anybody who actively acts negatively towards someone because they smoke weed is a ****, plain and simple - including everyone who has done that on this thread. Someone open-minded enough to not smoke but know facts and statistics would understand that there is no risk with cannabis worth actively discouraging it. If you spend 20 minutes googling and learning I'm sure by the end anybody not surrounded in stubbornness will realise that quite simply, 'whats the problem?'
II.
Ok, unless you're selling the stuff (and have been caught with scales, baggies and cash to prove it) or unless you're carrying at least 2 ounces (£300 +) - you're not going to jail unless you've been caught doing exactly the same TWICE before, less than 2 ounces can be claimed as personal use (though you might have to admit to dependence and attend rehab to avoid the slammer) Even then if you're not going to court with your burberry cap, chains and swearing then you're more likely to get a Drug Correctional course thing and some community service type **** (unless you were seeeriously packing)
III.
Rule one, stay away from the brown
IV.
I'd say its more likely that a cannabis smoker is more likely to know more about cannabis than most other topics tbh. People I know that smoke now and then, parties etc don't know the first thing about it scientifically or botanically, where-as the people I know that are heavy smokers know far more than you'd think had you known them personally (though it could be argued that's due to having to argue their case against anti-weed peeps). I dont know why but it creates a passion, hence the millions of people calling for legilisation, the many books/ films - the whole culture really, its something else.
V.
Aw diddums, so naive. To quote a paraphernalia site - "everyone does it" (dot com for those interested)
VI.
It takes on average 21 grams of pure THC to cause an overdose (based on the LD50 of rats or somethin), and it would have to be smoked within a 15 minute timescale. I trust your IQ is high enough that you realise this is entirely not possible.
I seriously cba anymore. I might update more but I doubt it, I formatted this **** and everything.
Super Conclusion of Doom:
Weed is fine, harmless as long as you know your limits and use responsibly, extremely fun, a great social drug, and doesn't deserve its reputation (thank you William Randolph Hearst, senór Jackass). If you don't like it, absolutly fair enough - but don't condemn me/ others because we do, especially if you dont know your ****.
p.s Joey Barton for Prime Minister
I) Agree
II) Agree
V) Since more and more younger people are beginning to smoke it, and the decline in education, then yes, I'd say a lot of people smoke it not properly informed. Not saying all weed smokers, I'm sure many are highly intelligent and/or know a lot about the substance. But still, if it's more openly available to younger kids, and they smoke it without knowing all of the facts, then it begins a spiralling generation of people smoking it.
Also, I was quoted out of context, so it makes less sense.
VI) You're confusing the terms highly rare and impossible. http://wiki.answers.com/Q/How_many_people_die_each_year_from_marijuana - You're confusing the terms highly rare and impossible. Overdosing falls into the former.
Come to Newcastle Upon Tyne and check out the bus stops then. It's very openly smoked around here. They get a few looks from people walking past, but thats about it. Wouldn't say its every part of Newcastle though, but the part I live people pretty much don't really care that much.