V5 of what mate?Heh... the first 15 matches are very promising... and it shows performance close to V5... I'll test for 100 more matches and if nothing changes I'll update the tactic.
V5 of what mate?Heh... the first 15 matches are very promising... and it shows performance close to V5... I'll test for 100 more matches and if nothing changes I'll update the tactic.
Heh... the first 15 matches are very promising... and it shows performance close to V5... I'll test for 100 more matches and if nothing changes I'll update the tactic.
V5 of what mate?
are you using the AM / T Combo or the SS / f9?
Would you say it has made this tactic a little better? I feel it is pretty perfect as it is.The same configuration as Reborn V5 only without F9.
Release the beast mateThe same configuration as Reborn V5 only without F9.
Would you say it has made this tactic a little better? I feel it is pretty perfect as it is.
Release the beast mate
There is a big problem to compare Reborn V5 and Monstrous P & P V2 because I use "IR" when I test P & P and when I test Reborn v5 I have to play matches by myself because of manual marking and testing process goes very slowly because of this so I've played only 60 matches so far with Reborn V5 and both tactics show more or less equally performance but this amount of matches is just a small drop in ocean and in order to properly compare them need to play about 300 matches... but I think it takes ages for me to play 300 matches with Reborn so I wouldn’t hope to get this data soon.so which one won you test TFF ?
Will the player filters change for striker and amc?
There is a big problem to compare Reborn V5 and Monstrous P & P V2 because I use "IR" when I test P & P and when I test Reborn v5 I have to play matches by myself because of manual marking and testing process goes very slowly because of this so I've played only 60 matches so far with Reborn V5 and both tactics show more or less equally performance but this amount of matches is just a small drop in ocean and in order to properly compare them need to play about 300 matches... but I think it takes ages for me to play 300 matches with Reborn so I wouldn’t hope to get this data soon.
he already updated the filters with the AM and striker new roels mate
Will the player filters change for striker and amc?
I do understand that.
In your testing stand what position got the lowest average rating? the cm(d)?
In both tatics that one is for me always the one who get "worst" ratings, maybe i attack so much that he doesnt have any work to do hehe
Do you think you still can get those statistics?
Maybe i'll change to BWM and see how that goes
There is a big problem to compare Reborn V5 and Monstrous P & P V2 because I use "IR" when I test P & P and when I test Reborn v5 I have to play matches by myself because of manual marking and testing process goes very slowly because of this so I've played only 60 matches so far with Reborn V5 and both tactics show more or less equally performance but this amount of matches is just a small drop in ocean and in order to properly compare them need to play about 300 matches... but I think it takes ages for me to play 300 matches with Reborn so I wouldn’t hope to get this data soon.
Heh, right now I'm too don't know for sure which tactic is better because the new updateds have brought very solid performance boost to both tactics... and there is not enough data to compare yet.I played 4 season with Reborn but Monstrous looks like better for me. Even Reborn is class (H)
Heh, right now I'm too don't know for sure which tactic is better because the new updateds have brought very solid performance boost to both tactics... and there is not enough data to compare yet.
Your effort is better mate forget comparing.So you're going to change filters right?