Hi again,
with respect, i think you have missed the point. I think you are doing a great job and am not advocating anyone attempt to hijack or create a 'rival' to your entertaining thread. i was just trying to point out that there are several potential problems that could result in good tactics slipping through the net.
one easy solution would be having a knock-out in each of the 4 leagues, that way the complaints re relative league strength would be redundant as the tactics would go head-to-head with the other test tactic within their league.
re. injuries, i disagree. if team A loses 2 star players but Team B doesn't, over the short league season format adopted, then variations in performance could be attributed to the strength of Tactic B over A. this would of course not necessarily be the case.
As with any testing its all about controlling the controllables. you wouldn't test the effectiveness of anti-cancer drugs without controlling the test group, i.e. do they smoke, exercise, eat well etc etc, its exactly the same principle here.
as i previously said, GOOD JOB! and keep up the good work. No need to be bitter, i think this is the best thread on FMBASE by a long way so please keep going ... forget the job and social life, we need our fix of tactic testing !!
Thanks,
Adam
"I was just trying to point out that there are several potential problems that could result in good tactics slipping through the net."
yeah, I do know that.. but looking up on the 2011 project, this is an improvement.. still working on some more improvements.. keep the suggestions coming!
"one easy solution would be having a knock-out in each of the 4 leagues, that way the complaints re relative league strength would be redundant as the tactics would go head-to-head with the other test tactic within their league."
as I said, I dont mind in any changes in the league format.. as long as someone make it for me.. I'm done cracking my head creating an edited league that works..
"re. injuries, i disagree. if team A loses 2 star players but Team B doesn't, over the short league season format adopted, then variations in performance could be attributed to the strength of Tactic B over A. this would of course not necessarily be the case."
and I'm disagree with you. this is exactly why I built the squad with 25 good players.. so they can cover eachother.. its not that I'm putting Bambang Pamungkas (aging Indonesian striker) to replace Aguero when he's out injured.. thats I why put pato, rossi, hiaguin, falcao in the team.. are they equal? no! but good enough.. injury is something we cant control.. even if I want to, how am I gonna do that?
"As with any testing its all about controlling the controllables. you wouldn't test the effectiveness of anti-cancer drugs without controlling the test group, i.e. do they smoke, exercise, eat well etc etc, its exactly the same principle here."
I know what you are talking about.. but these variables are just part of the testing.. it will be impossible to control everything.. injuries, difficulties of the league, the formations they are using, fixtures, even the referees will influence the outcome.. wont it be interesting to see how these tactics cope with all this?? even IRL, every club does not get the same 'treatments'.. or in any experiment, the results can always be challenged..
lemme put it this way: this is only a 'just for fun' testing project I'm doing apart from my busy activities.. I never claim the tactics that succesful here is the best tactics out there.. because other tacticians already showing their annoyance on what I'm doing here..
come on, its just a game, and this is just a stupid project..
I dont want something I do for fun turn out to be something I'm stressed with.. and trying to make everybody happy will give me just that..
Last edited: