STINGER !

radetzky said:
Hi TTF
may be some had already asked the same thing but I didn't find anything in thousands of posts in this thread and in Demolisher one.
In your head what is the ranking, from the best one to the weaker of the last tactics you'created?
DEMOLISHER ( STRIKERLESS ) V16 - DEMOLISHER ( STRIKER ) V18 - DEMOLISHER ( 4 Man D-Line ) V1 - STINGER ( STRIKERLESS ) V1 - TFF STINGER ( STRIKER ) V2

thx
Click to expand...

Its on the first post? Version (latest)

1) Demolisher ( Strikerless )

2) Demolisher ( Striker )

3) Stinger ( Strikerless )

4) Demolisher ( 4 man D-line version )

5) Stinger ( Striker )
 
wkdsoul said:
Its on the first post? Version (latest)

1) Demolisher ( Strikerless )

2) Demolisher ( Striker )

3) Stinger ( Strikerless )

4) Demolisher ( 4 man D-line version )

5) Stinger ( Striker )
Click to expand...

Ops, my fault! thanks
 
Strikerless V1 tactic is freaking amazing!

I used it with Bournemouth, predicted 15th and won the league! :)


dcd1.png

dcd2.png

dcd3.png
 
Last edited:
***********

A NEW VERSION OF THE TACTIC HAS BEEN ADDED TO THE OP






ASYMMETRIC 4-4-1-1 VERSION


Asymmetric_4-4-1-1_Formation.png

​
 
***********

A NEW VERSION OF THE TACTIC HAS BEEN ADDED TO THE OP






ASYMMETRIC 4-3-2-1 VERSION


Asymmetric_4-3-2-1_Formation.png

​
 
Hey tff, mate thanks for the tactic, how hard is to train an AMC to a striker?
 
tzahy said:
Hey tff, mate thanks for the tactic, how hard is to train an AMC to a striker?
Click to expand...

Mate, it differs greatly for every player and the required time might vary from few weeks to a year.

These factors greatly affects the required time:

1) The current rating for STC position, if it’s “ineffectual” then it might take a season or more, if it’s “Unconvincing” or “Competent” then it might take few weeks or few months.

2) Versatility attribute.

3) Total Number of positions a player can play at, the more positions a player can play, the harder to learn a new one.









BUMP
TotalFootballFan9 said:
***********

A NEW VERSION OF THE TACTIC HAS BEEN ADDED TO THE OP






ASYMMETRIC 4-3-2-1 VERSION


Asymmetric_4-3-2-1_Formation.png

​
Click to expand...

TotalFootballFan9 said:
***********

A NEW VERSION OF THE TACTIC HAS BEEN ADDED TO THE OP






ASYMMETRIC 4-4-1-1 VERSION


Asymmetric_4-4-1-1_Formation.png

​
Click to expand...


TotalFootballFan9 said:
*****


THE WASTE TIME TACTIC HAS BEEN UPDATED



*****
​
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
Just for fun I gave the asymmetric 4-3-2-1 a go with Barca :)

I don't have any transfer updates and play on the default database so Neymar is still at Barca

I wanted to make a quick test so didn't bother with any micromanagement stuff and just used Instant Result for all matches

I think the result is OOOOOOKKKKKK :p (H)






brt1.png

brt2.png

brt3.png

brt4.png

brt5.png
 
Last edited:
WOW! :O I thought that only strikerless tactics was capable of producing crazy results but then I tried the Asymmetric 4-3-2-1 tactic…

Hoffenheim, predicted 7th, first season... I won the league and DFB-Pokal Cup! :)

Brilliant work, TFF!


0a3sksj.png

0a4sksj.png

0a1sksj.png

0a2sksj.png
 
RedUnited said:
Strikerless or the 4-3-2-1, which is the better?
Click to expand...

Hey, this is how TFF rank his tactics



I would rank the tactics in this order:


1st Place : Demolisher ( Strikerless )

2nd Place : Demolisher ( Striker )

3rd Place : Stinger ( Strikerless ) /// Stinger ( Assymetric 4-3-2-1 ) /// Stinger ( Assymetric 4-4-1-1 )

---------------------------------------

4th Place : Stinger ( Striker ) :: This is the weakest version, its efficiency is about 30% less than any other versions and I suggest using it only if like this formation very much.
 
So 3rd place is in no particular order, they're all just as good?
 
Seriously people don't use results in friendlies as examples. And that's even truer when you play with players like Barcelona's or Madrid's.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

FMBase

Beta

Resources

Top