Tactic Testing - European Super League

  • Thread starter Thread starter Will1981
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 312
  • Views Views 52K
Mr Langvatn said:
Remember that this is a heavy underdog test, not mid or top team. My Mean Machine tactic got butchered here as well, as it's not an underdog tactic :P
Click to expand...

I tested Killerbee with both Burnley and Deportivo. It's not a top team tactic although the formation would suggest otherwise. I achieved 7th with Burnley and 3rd with Deportivo first season. Hence why I'm rather surprised to see it falter so badly here.
 
Test 2 - Tactics


BLACK - KillerBee 15.3.1 - HITMAN

BLUE - Tinkerman's Goalscoring Strikeforce

GREEN - Mr Langvatn 4-2-4 Gung-Ho

RED - V1 4231 Be Legendary

WHITE - Joss Final Overload

YELLOW - Bad Possession V1.2r
 
justified said:
I tested Killerbee with both Burnley and Deportivo. It's not a top team tactic although the formation would suggest otherwise. I achieved 7th with Burnley and 3rd with Deportivo first season. Hence why I'm rather surprised to see it falter so badly here.
Click to expand...
I have tested it on previous tests and it has always been very solid and so has bad possession but I think the quality of opposition in this test is much stronger than any of the domestic league's and more on par with champions league football.
 
Test 2 - Tactics


BLACK - KillerBee 15.3.1 - HITMAN

BLUE - Tinkerman's Goalscoring Strikeforce

GREEN - Mr Langvatn 4-2-4 Gung-Ho

RED - V1 4231 Be Legendary

WHITE - Joss Final Overload

YELLOW - Bad Possession V1.2r
 
Will1981 said:
I have tested it on previous tests and it has always been very solid and so has bad possession but I think the quality of opposition in this test is much stronger than any of the domestic league's and more on par with champions league football.
Click to expand...

Yeah, it might be a little too hard test :P Like a championship team playing against the likes of Barcelona and Real Madrid :P
 
The Gung-Ho second place, or 3rd place total, not bad :) Although, I still believe that the Mean Machine is a better tactic overall than the Gung-Ho, just not in this test :)
 
Last edited:
Test 2 - Tactics


BLACK - KillerBee 15.3.1 - HITMAN

BLUE - Tinkerman's Goalscoring Strikeforce

GREEN - Mr Langvatn 4-2-4 Gung-Ho

RED - V1 4231 Be Legendary

WHITE - Joss Final Overload

YELLOW - Bad Possession V1.2r

[TABLE="width: 825"]
[TR]
[TD="class: et3, width: 214"]TACTIC[/TD]
[TD="class: et3, width: 91"]AUTHOR[/TD]
[TD="class: et3, width: 56"]FORMATION[/TD]
[TD="class: et3, width: 28"]Pld[/TD]
[TD="class: et3, width: 35"]Won[/TD]
[TD="class: et3, width: 30"]Drn[/TD]
[TD="class: et3, width: 29"]Lst[/TD]
[TD="class: et3, width: 32"]For[/TD]
[TD="class: et3, width: 64"]Ag[/TD]
[TD="class: et3, width: 64"]G. D[/TD]
[TD="class: et3, width: 39"]H.Pts[/TD]
[TD="class: et3, width: 40"]A.Pts[/TD]
[TD="class: et3, width: 39"]T.Pts[/TD]
[TD="class: et3, width: 64"]G.F.C[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: et2, width: 214"]Tinkerman's Goalscoring Strikeforce[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 91"]The Tinkerman[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 56"]4-1-2-3 DM Narrow[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 28"]50[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 35"]28[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 30"]13[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 29"]9[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 32"]144[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 64"]92[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 64"]52[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 39"]61[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 40"]36[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 39"]97[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 64"]44[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: et2, width: 214"]V1 3ST Be Legendary[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 91"]CristianEriksen[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 56"]4-1-2-3 DM Narrow[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 28"]50[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 35"]26[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 30"]12[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 29"]12[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 32"]119[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 64"]79[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 64"]40[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 39"]59[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 40"]31[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 39"]90[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 64"]17[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: et2, width: 214"]Mr Langvatn 4-2-4 Gung-Ho Madness Final Version[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 91"]Mr Langvatn[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 56"]4-2-1-3 DM Narrow Asymmetric AM(C)[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 28"]50[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 35"]28[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 30"]4[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 29"]18[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 32"]149[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 64"]123[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 64"]26[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 39"]67[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 40"]21[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 39"]88[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 64"]33[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: et2, width: 214"]Joss Final Overload[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 91"]lechibaw[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 56"]4-1-2-3 DM Narrow[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 28"]50[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 35"]26[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 30"]6[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 29"]18[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 32"]111[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 64"]90[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 64"]21[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 39"]52[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 40"]32[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 39"]84[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 64"]37[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: et2, width: 214"]4-3-3 (Goal Machine)[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 91"]seeursaw[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 56"]4-3-3 Narrow[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 28"]50[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 35"]23[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 30"]8[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 29"]19[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 32"]109[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 64"]96[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 64"]13[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 39"]51[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 40"]26[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 39"]77[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 64"]22[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: et2, width: 214"]V1 4231 Be Legendary[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 91"]CristianEriksen[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 56"]4-2-3-1 Wide[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 28"]50[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 35"]24[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 30"]5[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 29"]21[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 32"]97[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 64"]99[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 64"]-2[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 39"]56[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 40"]21[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 39"]77[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 64"]13[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: et2, width: 214"]Bantons 2nd try BARCE[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 91"]Banton[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 56"]4-3-3 Wide[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 28"]50[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 35"]23[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 30"]7[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 29"]20[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 32"]71[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 64"]72[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 64"]-1[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 39"]59[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 40"]17[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 39"]76[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 64"]7[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: et2, width: 214"]Bad Possession v1.2[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 91"]pl3rious[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 56"]4-2-4 DM Asymmetric AM (L)[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 28"]50[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 35"]16[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 30"]12[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 29"]22[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 32"]115[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 64"]109[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 64"]6[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 39"]44[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 40"]16[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 39"]60[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 64"]29[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: et2, width: 214"]TFF EXECUTIONER (ULTIMATE) V6[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 91"]TotalFootballFan9[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 56"]4-4-2 Asymmetric ST(C)[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 28"]50[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 35"]17[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 30"]9[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 29"]24[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 32"]90[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 64"]120[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 64"]-30[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 39"]50[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 40"]10[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 39"]60[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 64"]5[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: et2, width: 214"]Mr Langvatn 2-5-3 Mean Machine[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 91"]Mr Langvatn[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 56"]4-1-2-3 DM WB[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 28"]50[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 35"]16[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 30"]8[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 29"]26[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 32"]86[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 64"]106[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 64"]-20[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 39"]36[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 40"]20[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 39"]56[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 64"]16[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: et2, width: 214"]KillerBee 15.3.1 - HITMAN[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 91"]psycadelik[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 56"]4-2-3-1 Wide[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 28"]50[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 35"]15[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 30"]9[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 29"]26[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 32"]78[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 64"]121[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 64"]-43[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 39"]40[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 40"]14[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 39"]54[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 64"]17[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: et2, width: 214"]Bad Possession v1.2r[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 91"]pl3rious[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 56"]4-2-4 DM Asymmetric AM (R)[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 28"]50[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 35"]13[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 30"]11[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 29"]26[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 32"]85[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 64"]124[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 64"]-39[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 39"]27[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 40"]23[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 39"]50[/TD]
[TD="class: et2, width: 64"]16[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
 
Will1981 said:
I have tested it on previous tests and it has always been very solid and so has bad possession but I think the quality of opposition in this test is much stronger than any of the domestic league's and more on par with champions league football.
Click to expand...

Yes... quality means everything but it can't be measured as "CA" and you can be hemmer in Champions League with 140CA team if CA of all players is awfully spent and you can win Champions League with 120CA team if CA of all is perfectly spent...
 
haha Narrow, Narrow, Narrow, Narrow, Narrow.. I think we can see a theme here :D
 
jasonbhoys said:
TFF why don't you just make one?
Click to expand...

Heh :) I've already got one for myself... and I spent such time on it probably more than on any of my tactic ;) and without it I wouldn't know the strength of my tactic and other tactics...
 
Last edited:
TotalFootballFan9 said:
Yes... quality means everything but it can't be measured as "CA" and you can be hemmer in Champions League with 140CA team if CA of all players is awfully spent and you can win Champions League with 120CA team if CA of all is perfectly spent...
Click to expand...

But if all CA was perfectely spent on all players woudnt be that unrealistic? well how much times do you see in game players with perfectely spent CA attributes?
 
Test 3 - Tactics


BLACK - MrFunk DLF

BLUE - V1 433 Be Legendary

GREEN - Dredd ( H )

RED - TukTuk Final

WHITE - MrL 3-5-2 Zynder's Request

YELLOW - KillerBee 15.3
 
Let's see if the dredd will judge the league :)
Thanks for testing it Will
 
fullsynchro said:
But if all CA was perfectely spent on all players woudnt be that unrealistic? well how much times do you see in game players with perfectely spent CA attributes?
Click to expand...

Sure! It's all around... FM consists of such thing there are thousands of 120-140 CA players in FM and some of them are "unknown" and play for "unknown" clubs and some of them are world famous players and play for top clubs.
 
Test 3 - Tactics


BLACK - MrFunk DLF

BLUE - V1 433 Be Legendary

GREEN - Dredd ( H )

RED - TukTuk Final

WHITE - MrL 3-5-2 Zynder's Request

YELLOW - KillerBee 15.3
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

FMBase

Beta

Resources

Back
Top